Risk to Schedule 1 birds on Seasalter levels

Today we republish an article from an RSPB blog. It provides a fascinating insight into the birds of area just next to the proposed solar power station. In this one article I counted six Schedule 1 birds: Snow Bunting, Hen Harrier, Marsh Harrier, Peregrine, Bearded Tit, and Cetti’s Warbler.

There is a choice for the Graveney, Nagden and Cleve Marshes. Go with the proposed ‘managed retreat, strategy which would eventually make this land an inter-tidal version of that at Seasalter. Or we let the land become industrialised with 1 million solar panels which would make this area one of the world’s largest buildings. Which one do you think will help the birds on Seasalter?

Don’t forget to count the wildlife and report it!

Seasalter Levels Wetland Bird Surveys – an overview

26 May 2017

An update composed by Blean Woods and Seasalter Levels intern, Ben Lawson:

In a slight change to the blog, I am going to introduce you to Blean Woods’ associated reserve Seasalter Levels. Seasalter is a small town located to the west of Whitstable and the reserve, while not yet open to the public, is comprised mainly of wet grassland with some patches of scrub and a reedbed.

Over the winter, we have been conducting WeBS (Wetland Bird Surveys) to monitor the numbers of non-breeding bird species that use the reserve. For each survey, there are 6 separate transects routes along which birds are recorded. These include; the LNR (‘local nature reserve’ – the wettest area of Seasalter), which has 2 transects within and Alberta (a small area of fields close to the coast). The land parcels known as Vikings and the Whitstable Bay Estate are areas that are currently only monitored by the RSPB with no current management influence and, finally; the Coastal transect from the Sportsman pub in Graveney to the Neptune pub in Whitstable. The coast is only monitored by the RSPB with no management control and all results on that particular transect being submitted to the BTO.

WeBS starts at Seasalter in September with highlights including 13 Gadwall on Vikings, a Peregrine Falcon on the LNR and 129 Ringed Plover along the coast.

In October, wader numbers began to rise with 84 Turnstone on the coast and 14 snipe recorded on the LNR along with our first Bearded tits! Redshank began to appear along the coast in November along with a small group of Snow bunting while a single Marsh Harrier continued its stay on the LNR. Curlew numbers were at their peak in December with a flock of 80 seen along the coast while Stonechat continued to make an appearance on the LNR. The real Christmas present this year was the appearance of a Hen harrier at Vikings.

The new year brought with it some fresh highlights. Along with a small group of Sanderling and a flock of 506 Dunlin along the coast, Meadow pipits were present on both the LNR (24) and Alberta (28).

February gave us vast numbers of lapwing along the coast (347) along with a group of 96 Golden Plover while Curlew and Teal moved to the LNR and both Buzzards and Ravens were spotted at Vikings. The final WeBS took place in March and most of the autumn migrants were leaving our shores for their breeding grounds further north. With that being said, Brent geese gathered in large flocks on the coast (372) and Oystercatchers were again present. The real indication that Spring had truly arrived was the sight and sound of the Cetti’s warbler returning to our ditches.

As spring arrived WeBS finished to make way for Breeding Bird Surveys (BBS) which helps us create records for which birds use Seasalter as a breeding ground during the spring, with especially close attention paid to target wet grassland species Lapwing and Redshank!

All photos courtesy of Dave Smithhhh

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Risk to Schedule 1 birds on Seasalter levels

Add yours

  1. What a pity RSPB have declined to take any part in our opposition to the 1,000,000 solar panels at Cleve Hill. I got an email from the RSPB Campaigns Manager saying exactly that. And a press release in Dec 2017 by the local RSPB in response to the publication of the developer’s plans only mentioned a skylark that might be disturbed. So it’s all up to us! Support GREAT!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. shame on the RSPB, they are now too big for their own wading boots,ignoring real issues and taking people and organisations to court and wasting huge amounts of money. As for our local group totally pathetic are they too scared to get involved because of the powers that be?

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: